This is a temporary entry, to address the need to communicate the censored components of my posting on mercatornet. This censoring deprived me of the chance to defend myself against an accusation that I went 'off-topic' with my postings, and that I was engaging in "gay bashing". 

The person that leveled these accusations against me is a homosexualist ideologue who frequents and trolls websites where shim accuses people of all sort of things. The hateful stuff which this idiot infects websites with is amazing in its stupidity and immaturity. This would not matter much, as such homosexualist ebolic growth is common nowadays on websites which attempt to challenge the new world order, except that this particular individual is part of a small group of ideologues which is being tolerated and allowed to consistently insult supporters of articles on mercatornet. 

Because the individual I am responding to here is a patently stupid person, I decided to use a mixture of words and images to provide the explanation I was not allowed to post on mercatornet.

In a nutshell, language is what enables us to make sense of ourselves, to share meanings in common within society, and to exercise power for good or evil. When we are asked to extinguish the existing meaning of something by attaching new ones to it, we curiously want to know and understand why we should do this before we agree to it. However, when we find that language is being changed furtively and with particular political intent designed to serve the interests of a particular group and to diminish those of others, we tend to become very suspicious. We rightly complain, expose and decry the stealth  because it indicates to us that those behind its use have something to hide from us. So what happens when homosexualists try to employ this strategy through the media and they get caught out? The short answer is that they get cranky and do everything they can to muzzle anyone who attempts to point this out. 

If you have been active arguing and fighting online against homosexualism, no doubt you have encountered a persistent bombardment of hate-filled comments directed at you. This is of course something that many of us have come to expect when we challenge any or all of the dehumanising ideologies of death, like abortionism, homosexualism, atheism and radical feminism. Veterans of online social media and commentary battles develop thick skins and the persistence of rocks in midstream. They have to if they are to keep their sanity and sanctity of belief.

This is a response to what I think is an eminent example of a sustained but highly incompetent homosexualist attack. This particular specimen has been trolling the forum, to bait everyone he could in an online discussion which developed in response to an article titled Should Australia have a referendum on same-sex marriage? This on an excellent website maintained by a group of people who openly identify as holding Christian values and traditional views on important contemporary issues like same sex marriage and abortion: Mercatornet.com.