This is a temporary entry, to address the need to communicate the censored components of my posting on mercatornet. This censoring deprived me of the chance to defend myself against an accusation that I went 'off-topic' with my postings, and that I was engaging in "gay bashing".
The person that leveled these accusations against me is a homosexualist ideologue who frequents and trolls websites where shim accuses people of all sort of things. The hateful stuff which this idiot infects websites with is amazing in its stupidity and immaturity. This would not matter much, as such homosexualist ebolic growth is common nowadays on websites which attempt to challenge the new world order, except that this particular individual is part of a small group of ideologues which is being tolerated and allowed to consistently insult supporters of articles on mercatornet.
Because the individual I am responding to here is a patently stupid person, I decided to use a mixture of words and images to provide the explanation I was not allowed to post on mercatornet.
The person that leveled these accusations against me is a homosexualist ideologue who frequents and trolls websites where shim accuses people of all sort of things. The hateful stuff which this idiot infects websites with is amazing in its stupidity and immaturity. This would not matter much, as such homosexualist ebolic growth is common nowadays on websites which attempt to challenge the new world order, except that this particular individual is part of a small group of ideologues which is being tolerated and allowed to consistently insult supporters of articles on mercatornet.
Because the individual I am responding to here is a patently stupid person, I decided to use a mixture of words and images to provide the explanation I was not allowed to post on mercatornet.
The accusation
What actually happened
So this illiterate homosexualist accuses me of:
- Going off topic
- Engaging in "gay bashing"
- That I "smear and demean sexual minorities"
It can be seen here that my first comment was addressing the topic, which is on Brendan Eich's homosexualist-facilitated resignation. Then a homosexualist troll, a regular detractor of supporters of mercatornet, responds to my posting, accusing me of being one of the "least civil people" shim's ever "dealt with", and that it finds my remarks "comical". This is not an issue, this poor old demented loser does the job it was obviously enlisted to do; rather, the issue for us here is how the so-called conversation became "off topic". Clearly, it was not me that directed it "off-topic". You'll note that the moderators did nothing in this case - in fact, they allowed shim to go on for some time to direct its usual insults at anyone challenging the homosexualist doctrine on merccatornet.
So then, I determined that I should direct this typically destructive exchange into a constructive endeavour, choosing to use every opportunity which the sad homosexualist provided me when directing its hateful comments at me to post a link to a resource which shows some aspect of what hides behind the facade of homosexualism. See how this unfolds in the screen capture below:
So then, I determined that I should direct this typically destructive exchange into a constructive endeavour, choosing to use every opportunity which the sad homosexualist provided me when directing its hateful comments at me to post a link to a resource which shows some aspect of what hides behind the facade of homosexualism. See how this unfolds in the screen capture below:
My disallowed [in-reply] comment
Now that I demonstrated how patently wrong the accusation by Str8Grandmother that it was me who directed the discussion "off-topic" is, and how I was persuaded by its colleague to start posting links to resources, here is my (disallowed) comment in reply to these accusations:
The homosexualists smear sexual minorities. The reason I posted the links to those resources was made quite clear at the outset of my exchange with David, which, by the way, he initiated - if you care to look at it more closely. David put the conversation "off-topic" with this off-topic post, which he posted in response to my comment on another person's posting:
"Dania, you are one of the least civil people I have ever dealt with. In light of that your remarks become comical."
He then went on to post other insults, as is his habit. I then wrote this, to warn him of what I will do, should he continue:
"Now, here's what I will do. We will use the propaganda you represent and sprout constructively, and we'll enlist your help to help us spread information about what homosexualism hides. This will also demonstrate to you that there can be a price exacted each time you post something like the above. So every time you do this, I will consider it an invitation to post a link to a resource that informs people about the real face of what you sprout. "
So I think you should berate and complain about David, not me. You can get to follow up what Catholics (or anyone else) does. The point that you neglect to mention is that the same exact laws apply to deal with predators and individuals who hurt other people regardless of their religion, sexual orientation, race, etc.. What we are talking about is special rights for your 'minorities', and the ideology of homosexualism which is raging a war against heteronormality. As for the stuff about the person I cited - Masha Gessen is not representative of homosexuaalism? Then who is? Your friend Scott Rose? Dan Savage? Then, if you have the stomach for it, listen to what Savage had to say about marriage:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C-laWOpXxC8 (Warning! It is quite foul!)
Can you tell us, please, how does pointing out these things constitutes 'gay bashing'? Or, to return us to the topic, is discussing them not permitted by 'tolerant' ideologues like you, just as in the case of Brendan Eich?
----------------------------------
In the event, I am interested to know why my comment (copied above) has been disallowed.
In the event, I am interested to know why my comment (copied above) has been disallowed.